FIPA Schools Supreme Student Government

FIPA Schools Supreme Student Government Leader Peer Evaluation Form

Instructions: This peer evaluation form is designed for SSG leaders within FIPA Schools to assess the performance of their fellow leaders in various positions. The purpose is to encourage constructive feedback, promote teamwork, and identify areas for improvement. Please provide honest and thoughtful responses. Your feedback will contribute to the overall growth and effectiveness of the SSG within FIPA Schools.

Personal Information:

Full Name: (Last Name, First Name, Middle Name)

* settings

SSG Position:

* settings

Grade/Year Level:

* settings

Name of the SSG Leader Being Evaluated:

* settings

Position of the Leader Being Evaluated: 

* settings

Grade/Year Level of the Leader Being Evaluated: 

* settings

Date of Evaluation: 

* settings

1. Communication Skills: * settings

	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Needs Improvement	Unsatisfactory
How effectively does the leader being evaluated communicate with other SSG members, students, and school staff?

2. Collaboration * settings

	Actively promotes collaboration	Generally collaborative but could improve	Occasionally collaborative	Rarely collaborative	Does not contribute to student body collaboration
To what extent does the leader foster collaboration and communication with other FIPA Schools' SSG members and foster teamwork?

3. Leadership Style: settings

	Transformational - Inspiring positive change and growth by setting a vision, motivating others, and fostering a sense of unity and collaboration.	Servant Leadership - Putting the needs of others first, leading with empathy, and actively supporting the success and well-being of the team.	Democratic - Involving everyone in decision-making, considering diverse opinions, and reaching consensus to ensure fair representation.	Authoritative - Providing clear direction and guidance, making decisions decisively, and maintaining control to achieve organizational goals.	Leadership style is not yet fully developed	No Leadership Style Shown
Describe the leadership style of the leader being evaluated.

4. Initiative and Innovation: * settings

	Implemented creative programs	Fostered a culture of innovation	Collaborated on inter-class initiatives	Needs improvement	None
Give examples of initiatives and innovative ideas the leader has introduced to improve the SSG and its impact on FIPA Schools.

5. Teamwork: * settings

	Excellent team player	Generally, a team player but could improve	Occasionally a team player	Rarely a team player	Does not contribute positively to the team
How well does the leader being evaluated contribute to a positive team dynamic within and when collaborating with other FIPA schools SSGs?

6. Support for Team Members: * settings

	Always supportive and helpful	Generally supportive but could improve	Occasionally supportive	Rarely supportive	Does not provide support to team members
To what extent does the leader support and assist their fellow SSG members in their tasks and responsibilities, both within the school and in collaborative efforts?

7. Event Planning: * settings

	Detailed planning and coordination	Effective delegation of tasks	Adherence to timelines and deadlines	Passive and Poor involvement in planning and collaborative events	None
Evaluate the leader's involvement in planning school events and collaborative events with FIPA Schools, and their contributions to the success of these events.

8. Event Execution: * settings

	Executes events smoothly with minimal issues	Effectively addresses challenges	Could improve in event execution	Faces challenges but struggles to address them	Poor execution of events
Assess how well the leader contributes to the smooth execution of events and their ability to address challenges, both within their school and in collaboration with other SSG leaders.

9. Openness to Feedback: * settings

	Very open and actively seeks feedback	Generally open but could be more receptive	Occasionally open to feedback	Resistant to feedback	Does not seek or accept feedback
How open is the leader being evaluated to feedback and suggestions from peers, advisors, and leaders from FIPA Schools?

10. Self-Reflection: * settings

	Regularly self-reflects and sets goals for improvement	Occasionally self-reflects	Rarely self-reflects	Does not engage in self-reflection
How well does the leader reflect on their performance and identify areas for improvement, both individually and in collaboration within the school?

11. Strengths: (Identify specific strengths and positive aspects of the leader's performance, particularly in the context of their role in FIPA Schools' SSG collaboration.)

* settings

12.  Areas for Improvement: (Provide constructive feedback on areas where the leader could improve, considering their role within their school and their contributions to FIPA Schools' SSG collaboration.)

* settings

Overall Assessment: * settings

	Outstanding	Good	Satisfactory	Needs Improvement	Unsatisfactory
Rating

Note:  This evaluation form is designed to promote constructive feedback and collaboration among SSG leaders within FIPA Schools. All responses should be respectful, focused on improvement, and contribute to the overall success of the SSG.

Attach Signature of the Evaluator over Printed Name: settings

Submit

FIPA Schools Supreme Student Government Leader Peer Evaluation Form

Click Submit to finish.

arrow_back Back Submit