Google Sandbox

What is the assessment? *

Please include a brief description of the subject area and type of assessment

What HE institution are you from? *

What AI user level do you believe students use in this module? *

USER LEVEL 1: text generator - no or negligible editing, little or no learning necessary

USER LEVEL 2: text editor - significant editing, including some peripheral learning necessary

USER LEVEL 3: concept curator - finding sources and explaining concepts, some text generation possible but not suitable without significant user curation (core learning required)

Size: This assessment is *

Assessment should require around 20-25% of the student effort allocated to each module. A 10 credit module is equivalent to 100 student effort hours.

1. Small: 15-20 student effort hours (equivalent to 1,000 – 2,000 words)

2. Medium: 30-40 hours (equivalent to 2,500 – 3,500 words)

3. Large: 60-70 hours (equivalent to 4,000 – 5,000 words)

Turnaround: Students can complete the assessment in *

The calendar time available to students to work on their assessment, between receiving the assessment briefs and the deadline for their submission, when they can access generative AI.

1. Hours (anywhere between 3h to 24h – 48h)

2. Days or weeks (up to 4 weeks)

3. Months (from start of the semester to the assessment period)

Structure: The structure of this assessment is *

What is specified in the assessment brief

1. Open: broad topic/area of investigation, students create their own structure

2. Scaffolded: tutors recommend or expect a structure, but the content remains flexible

3. Closed: the expected content is underpinned by specific requirements (specific data, spreadsheets, budgets, balance sheets, quiz questions)

Context: The context of this assessment is *

What is specified in the brief and arranged in the module delivery

1. Broad: stipulates no context or allows students to choose the context (e.g. ‘discuss a theory or apply a model with examples’, ‘compare these viewpoints using examples’)

2. Focused: offers a case study, company, or specific example to focus on, but the information is easily accessible online (e.g. companies such as Google, Apple, etc; industries such as banking, pharmaceuticals; country analyses such as ‘doing business in Peru’, etc.)

3. Embedded: based on a local small company (with little online information available), their own business, the company where the students have completed a placement, a live-client brief designed specifically for the module and with a task to address a real client’s needs, or data is behind a paywall

Format: The type of communication required in this assessment is *

If your module's assessment combines some of these formats, choose the one that weighs most in the final grade

1. Written: test or piece of work which involves writing rather than doing something practical or giving spoken answers

2. Artifact: object, poster, piece of work is one which involves creating, building, doing something practical rather than, writing or giving spoken answers

3. Oral: assessment which involves giving spoken answers rather that writing or doing something practical

Foundation: The basis for this assessment is *

If your module's assessment combines some of these elements, choose the one that weighs most in the final grade

1. Theoretical: the assessment requires reading, studying, and academic research (journal articles, literature reviews, argumentative essays, theoretical critiques)

2. Mixed: a combination of academic research and application (contextualization) to real-world examples and cases (live client briefs, case study methods, portfolios of evidence, market research).

3. Practical: The assessment requires hands-on experience and experimentation (empirical testing, laboratory testing, performance).

Criticality & Reflectivity: This assessment requires students to be *

If your module's assessment combines some of these elements, choose the one that weighs most in the final grade

1. Analytical: engage in academic debates and research happening in the subject area, and offer a comparison of viewpoints.

2. Evaluative: synthesize and apply academic debates and research, and provide a nuanced exposition of the relative importance of viewpoints and their implications.

3. Reflective: make connections between experience and prior learning, reflect on how and why understanding may have changed, and refer to relevant theoretical framework to support their arguments

Continuity: This assessment is tied to assessment in another module *

This could be a formal pre-requisite, or informally scaffolded (e.g. students use previous assessment context, materials, their own company, etc).

Groupwork: This assessment requires students to work in a group and assessment is marked as group *

If you approach is mixed, choose YES only if the results of groupwork are predominant in the final grade

ASSESSMENT AI SCORE

ASSESSMENT AI SCORE

ASSESSMENT AI SCORE